WC.com

Tuesday, November 5, 2024

Self Love

I was honored in October 2024 to present with an exemplary panel of peers at the National Disability and Worker’s Compensation Conference in Las Vegas Nevada. It was an intriguing experience in a couple of perspectives and was most rewarding overall. 

One intriguing point in the presentation was in the planning. There was no meeting of the five participants (four panelists and a moderator): Stuart Colburn, Hon. Tim Conner, Hon. Stephanie Kinney, and Hon. Robert Rassp. 

In order to facilitate our “60 tips and 60 minutes,” the four panelists were asked to submit 20 tips each. Our expert moderator, Stuart Colburn, collated and organized them, placing a reduced 15 tips each into a PowerPoint.

The presentation was therefore not contemporaneous in the truest sense. However, we each had no idea which of our tips made the final cut. The other presenters likely have better memories than I, but I frankly did not remember any of the tips I had submitted weeks earlier in a fit of last-minute compliance. Therefore, there was a certain contemporaneous air to the panel. 

It kept the session both interesting and engaging. There is a real value in not rehearsing, scripting, or structuring. As we hit our individual tips, and heard each other, there was genuine interjection and interaction among the panel. It was real, engaging, and well-received. 

As we chatted afterward, Mr. Colburn noted a second intriguing observation. Each of the four speakers had largely adopted a personal theme for their tips. Amazingly, despite our professional association and occupation similarities, we were significantly distinct. It would not have been more so if Mr. Colburn had assigned us individual themes for our individual tips at the outset. 

There was a focus on law, trial practice, appellate practice, professionalism, and self-protection. Without ever contemplating it as such, that last one was my theme. We have to be focused on our personal self-protection. Make no mistake, I’m not advocating narcissism or anything close to it. I'm not talking about Brittany's sologomy (wonder where she took herself for the honeymoon?). It’s not about a disorder. it is about caring for yourself.

As I noted during the presentation, a phenomenal piece of advice is provided at the beginning of every airline flight. The flight crew will remind you to "put your mask on first before you assist others." If you fail to do so, you will likely find yourself utterly incapable of assisting those around you. In failing to preserve and protect yourself, you are cheating yourself and everyone who needs you.

These thoughts came back to me reading an article on the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) regarding Canadian tourism. A hotel owner who suffered loss from wildfire expressed her coping mechanism:
“There is a lot to do, but I try and focus on what I have to do today, and leave tomorrow to tomorrow,”
Certainly, focusing on the things that you can accomplish, and striving to push away unproductive worry regarding those things that you cannot change is advisable. Focus on the today. That is great advice for us all. Keep an eye on the ball today, because worrying over tomorrow's pitches will just cause angst. 

I think it is as important to focus on your own health similarly. Do not push aside your preferred release (walking, yoga, meditation, reading, golf, etc.) to focus elsewhere. Find the time, make the time, to focus on yourself and whatever release you cherish or just need. That time is yours and is no different than putting on that mask.

Relieving stress can come down to you. Others are going to be obsequious from time to time. Disagreement will happen. The world will not follow your preferred course consistently. People will cross you and let you down. Things will not always work out as planned or hoped. As they noted in a recent Disney movie:
Let it go, let it go
Can't hold it back anymore
Let it go, let it go
Turn away and slam the door
I don't care what they're going to say
Let the storm rage on
The cold never bothered me anyway
Frozen (Disney 2013)
You can let the world's dissonance and discord eat you up, or you can accept what you cannot change. Know that disagreement can be healthy as can be honest debate. But, when the debate ends and decisions are made (no matter how dumb they are), you have to "let it go." Make your contribution,  Voice your opinion. Then "let it go." It sometimes helps to remember the advice of a comedian who said "You can't fix stupid." Similarly, allowing stupid to bring you down or to dominate your thoughts is simply not productive or healthy. 

In this vein, I also recently read a LinkedIn post by an attorney in South Florida. I thought his advice on dealing with the challenges of litigation were meritorious and worthy of repeating. He noted that with maturity comes an ability to "let it go." He noted he has learned not to let the challenges (human or otherwise) get him down. He said:
"I care less about everything. Not in a jerk way, but in a 'why should I care' way. You're obnoxious? Don't care. You're trying to get a rise out of me? That's adorable. You're trying to play me? I have to care for that to work. You're trying to pull one over on me? Very cute. You think 2 + 2 is 5? Sounds great. I couldn't care less."
He noted that remaining above such frays is liberating and empowering. This is not a suggestion of not caring about your responsibilities and commitments. Contribute, engage, and participate. Follow your best judgment and provide your opinion. Then allow the ultimate decision to proceed and "let it go." Even the loftiest CEO in the most gilded perch finds her/himself compelled in directions that are undesired or unwanted.  "Let it go."

Take care of you. Don't sweat the small stuff. Remember that it is mostly all small stuff. Illegitimi non-carborundum. 

Sunday, November 3, 2024

First - What is it?

Back in 1980, The Empire Strikes Back (LucasFilm 1980) premiered. It was the movie that turned the splash of Star Wars (20th Century 1977) into a franchise. In it, the protagonist evolves, training to be a Jedi. In one engagement with his mentor, he notes "I'm not afraid." His mentor, Yoda, replies "You will be." I am reminded of that when I think about artificial intelligence (AI).

In fairness, that film is perhaps as dated a reference as Mick Jagger (who most young people today think is a foil from a Ke$ha song). Tom Holland (Spider-Man) illustrated that in Captain America: Civil War (Marvel 2016) with "Hey guys, you ever see that really old movie, Empire Strikes Back?" Ouch. Apologies if you are old enough to remember Empire without an Internet search. 

But, returning to Yoda, the question is whether you should be scared of AI. Is confidence like Luke's appropriate in our current posture, or should we be more reticent? In fairness, my reactions have vacillated over the last decade as I became aware of AI and its implications. I have spent significant time reading, listening, writing, lecturing, and prognosticating. See a list of related blog posts at the end of this post. 

At a time of cataclysmic change, I find myself still struggling to comprehend and predict where this ride ends. In my many conversations about it, I am comfortable that I am in the majority.

Before you decide your feelings about AI, you need to do some homework about what it is. There is too much shorthanding going on, with indiscriminate use of the "AI" label. It is fair to say that much will be labeled "AI" over the coming months and years. There is a desire in the marketplace for that assurance of recency and relevance.

When selecting your next toaster, there is some chance that you will be drawn by the package's reference to AI. That labeling may be the next "as seen on TV" or "new and improved," pushed upon us in such volume that it achieves innocuity or cliche. We all love that "new and improved" and it has likely sold more mediocrity over the years than Helen of Troy launched ships.

But what is AI? Before going there, let's be clear. It is not a panacea, a quintessence, a plague, or a panic. That said, in any particular event, situation, instance or need it might be any of these. However, it is none of these by its existence. It is not any of these by inherence. If and when it is any of these it will be because of its application in that instance, event, application, or moment.

AI can be evaluative or generative. That is, it can be an organizer and compiler or it can create content. That is a distinction worth thinking through. So, what is the capacity of the AI you are discussing, and does that meet with your expectations and anticipations regarding the performance you desire? 

If it is evaluative, it provides humans with output and leaves the interpretation or expression or application of that output to the human. If it is generative, it is producing output, interpretation, or analysis on its own. When humans repeat or reiterate that output without using their own intellect, sense, and skepticism will fall victim to the failings of AI. See, 

AI can be "narrow," "Strong," or "superintelligent." Its function can be "reactive," "limited," "theory," or even "self-aware." Well, those adjectives are all appropriate, but the use of present "can" is an overstatement. The fact is that "superintelligent" and "self-aware" are adjectives that may someday be appropriate outside the realm of Hollywood and the world of soothsayers like Isaac Asimov, Carl Sagan, and their brethren.

So, in the science fiction that may become our tomorrow, it is possible that self-aware, superintelligent computers will surround us. There may come a time in which they learn to interfere in our lives in a multitude of ways. Our fear in that time may be justified and understandable. 

Nonetheless, fears about the other end of the spectrum, the "evaluative" and "narrow" may be misguided or at least premature. At least so far, only the lazy, ignorant, or misguided have suffered at the hands of evaluative AI. They have engaged this tool, relied upon its results without question, and have suffered the consequences. See AI Incognito (December 2023).

Years ago, Henry David Thoreau noted:
“It is not enough to be industrious; so are the ants. What are you industrious about?”
I am suggesting that in our current moment, in your decision about whether you fear, dread, welcome, or endorse AI, “It is not enough to be AI; so are the toasters. What is the toaster's AI about?”


Prior posts on AI and Robotics
Attorneys Obsolete (December 2014)
Chatbot Wins (June 2016);
Nero May be Fiddling (April 2017)
The Coming Automation (November 2017)
Tech is Changing Work (November 2018)
Hallucinating Technology (January 2019)
Robot in the News (October 2021)
Safety is Coming (March 2022)
Long Term Solutions (June 2022)
Intelligence (November 2022)
You're Only Human (May 2023).
AI and the Latest (June 2023)
Mamma Always Said (June 2023)
AI Incognito (December 2023)
The Grinch (January 2024)
AI in Your Hand (April 2024)
AI and DAN (July 2024)
AI is a Tool (October 2024)
Rights for the Toaster (October 2024)
Everybody Wake Up! (October 2024)