The Internet is replete with websites explaining the difference between cats and dogs. Trust me, or Google it sometime. It is an interesting topic that has evolved into a broader societal comparison regarding people who are "dog people" or "cat people."
Discover Magazine returned to the topic in December 2021 with The Truth about Cat People and Dog People. It is perhaps one of the few remaining categorizations with which society remains comfortable denigrating groups based on personal preferences or paths.
The truth is that people are different
I have spoken at a fair number of conferences and seminars over the years. All told, including my efforts as a college instructor, I have delivered over 2,000 presentations over many years. As a member of a panel or solo, I have spoken to business owners, risk managers, human resource managers, claims adjusters, attorneys, doctors, nurses, brokers, consultants, safety professionals, and more. This has included audiences and conferences of various sizes, and at conferences large and small.
In the course of this, I have spoken at many of the premier workers' compensation events including the Workers' Compensation Institute, the National Disability Conference, the CompLaude program, the Florida Bar and Workers Compensation Claims Professionals Forum, The NCCI Issues Symposium, WCRI Issues and Research Conference, the American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons Workers' Compensation program, and a host of acronymic and state-specific programs across America.
Through those experiences, I have met a vast assortment of brilliant, motivated, inspired, and incredible people. I have also met a few who aspire to such adjectives and who may yet progress there with time. It has been an intriguing journey, and all of those people have contributed to my education, experience, and perspective.
Returning to the cats and dogs. We do not like to categorize people. We struggle against illusory superiority, assumptions, prejudices, and attributes associated with various groups. There are at least perceptions of pigeonholing, typecasting, and worse. Of course, it is still somehow acceptable in various circles to denigrate various professions and occupations with broad oversimplifications and insults.
The trend has largely passed, but it was once hip to make sport of attorneys. There are always those who find humor in physicians. There is something similar about accountants, engineers, dads, and blondes, and, in my youth, the denigration of various nationalities was in vogue. Now, somehow, we have reached an inflection point and are no longer able or willing to categorize.
There is an old lawyer joke about white mice, a laboratory, and lawyers. I have heard it told many times, in many ways. One of the punchlines about why labs use lawyers instead of mice is that "The medical researchers don’t become as emotionally attached to the attorneys." That is harsh, but it usually elicits a laugh. We like to make humor at the expense of others, and that has gotten a few into difficulties over the years.
The foundation of all of these constellations is the tendency to entertain predispositions and to stereotype large swaths of individuals based on some commonality that we are willing to label them with. That process of categorizing is both a human defense process and a convenience. Our predispositions make our day-to-day easier. We can judge the ___________ without too much analysis, thought, or introspection.
This human trend toward predisposition reliance has been studied, though not nearly exhaustively. It is a periodic topic at educational events, where speakers and panels strive to scratch the surface on the vast spectrum of potential predispositions and the myriad of potential impacts on our lives, personal and professional.
My exposures to these topics led me recently down a rabbit hole, and into an eye-opening journey. It was no Through the Looking Glass, Charles Lutwidge Dodgson, 1872, but it was an eye-opener nonetheless. I expected to define the predispositions to which we are all amenable and to strive to explore how some subset of them might impact the world of workers' compensation.
Despite years of contemplating some of these predispositions and a wealth of workers' compensation exposures, I was unprepared for the result. In the end, I found a far broader population of predispositions than expected. Obviously, my bias toward them was ill-conceived or underdeveloped.
In the end, I was able to accept that each of these could potentially impact the investigation, provision, claiming, negotiating, mediating, and adjudicating of workers' compensation benefits. The recognized predispositions can be categorized, compared, and differentiated. Nonetheless, each could impact perceptions, expressions, reactions, and more.
The result? I find myself now back in the armchair in Paradise. I reflect on the hours spent in study and contemplation and wonder at the experience. Unlike Alice, I am under no disillusion of reality. But I nonetheless reflect continuously on the journey.
The product of my journey is now available for free download. I encourage all who dip their toes in the world of workers' compensation to review and digest Unseen Influence: Unconscious Predisposition in Dispute Resolution (Langham, 2025).
It is not a short read, but the price is right (free), and the reader might benefit from my perspective and analysis or from their own contemplation or conclusions as to where I missed the boat.
In an effort to illuminate the topic further, I will be moderating an intriguing panel at the 2025 WCI. Come join us for some thoughts on predisposition, bias, and how it both enables and constrains our daily lives, personal and professional.
August 19, 2025
9:55 AM – 10:55 AM
Grand Ballroom 8A
Come join us for a brief foray through the looking glass!